Feudalised Science - indistinct criteria in assessing scientific achievement

Authors

  • Aleksander Kobylarek University of Wrocław

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15503/onis2017.9.13

Keywords:

feudalizm naukowy, kryteria oceny, miary nauki, psychologia oceny

Abstract

This article tackles the problems of assessing scientific output. It considers the varied determinants in distorting assessment, as well as criteria  which depend on insubstantive determinants. Obscure criteria can discourage young talented people and steer them away from science. Local (national) assessment criteria, which do not relate to an international perspective, also block its development outside the country.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Aleksander Kobylarek, University of Wrocław

PhD in humanities, assistant professor at the University of Wrocław (Poland) in Departament of Pedagogy, manager of the University of the Third Age in the University of Wrocław up to 2016, author of more than 100 scientific publications, including articles, books, chapters, editor-in-chief of international scientific "Journal of Education Culture and Society" and "Ogrody Nauk i Sztuk (Gardens of Science and Arts).

Downloads

Published

2017-07-16

How to Cite

[1]
Kobylarek, A. 2017. Feudalised Science - indistinct criteria in assessing scientific achievement. Gardens of Science and Arts. 7, 7 (Jul. 2017), 9–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15503/onis2017.9.13.

Issue

Vol. 7 (2017): Gardens of Science and Arts

Section

Wstęp