Food taboos outside the religious context:

vegetarians and vegans developed a taboo against meat eating

Authors

  • Anna Kusztal Instytut Psychologii, Wydział Nauk Historycznych i Pedagogicznych Uniwersytet Wrocławski ul. J. Wł. Dawida 1, 50-529 Wrocław
  • Eleonora Imbierowicz Instytut Filologii Angielskiej, Wydział Filologiczny Uniwersytet Wrocławski ul. Kuźnicza 22, 50-138 Wrocław
  • Kornelia Kiebus Instytut Psychologii, Wydział Nauk Historycznych i Pedagogicznych Uniwersytet Wrocławski ul. J. Wł. Dawida 1, 50-529 Wrocław
  • Urszula Frączek Instytut Psychologii, Wydział Nauk Historycznych i Pedagogicznych Uniwersytet Wrocławski ul. J. Wł. Dawida 1, 50-529 Wrocław

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15503/onis2024.35.51

Keywords:

taboo, attitude, veganism, vegetarianism, meat consumption

Abstract

Abstract

Aim. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a taboo against meat eating is forming in the vegetarian and vegan community.

Methods. For the purposes of the study, we created a questionnaire to measure taboo intensity and checked  it in relation to three behaviors: paying taxes, committing acts of incest and eating meat (the latter only meant for the group of vegetarians and vegans), in order to then compare the results with each other.

Results and conclusions. 515 people took part in the study, including 335 in the vegetarian and vegan group and 180 in the control group. The results of the study support the idea that vegetarians and vegans developed a moderate taboo against eating meat, which is closer to the general population's feelings about incest (clear taboo) than about paying taxes (no taboo). The study also considered a number of moderators of the taboo against eating meat, of which some personality traits (agreeableness, emotional stability), political views and taking care of a pet were found to be statistically significant predictors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Anna Kusztal, Instytut Psychologii, Wydział Nauk Historycznych i Pedagogicznych Uniwersytet Wrocławski ul. J. Wł. Dawida 1, 50-529 Wrocław

Studentka psychologii na Uniwersytecie Wrocławskim. Obecnie jest zaangażowana w badania dotyczące moralności jako kooperacji, wpływu social mediów na poprawianie swojego wyglądu oraz związku poczucia autentyczności jako stanu z czynami o charakterze moralnym. Planuje aplikować do szkoły doktorskiej i realizować badania związane z jej zainteresowaniami, w szczególności z obszaru psychologii moralności i psychologii ewolucyjnej.

Eleonora Imbierowicz, Instytut Filologii Angielskiej, Wydział Filologiczny Uniwersytet Wrocławski ul. Kuźnicza 22, 50-138 Wrocław

Starsza wykładowczyni w Instytucie Filologii Angielskiej, magistra filologii angielskiej i prawa oraz studentka psychologii na Uniwersytecie Wrocławskim. Zajmuje się grami cyfrowymi, posthumanizmem, animal studies.

Kornelia Kiebus, Instytut Psychologii, Wydział Nauk Historycznych i Pedagogicznych Uniwersytet Wrocławski ul. J. Wł. Dawida 1, 50-529 Wrocław

Studentka psychologii na Uniwersytecie Wrocławskim. Jej główne zainteresowania obejmują zagadnienia lęku przed śmiercią i inteligencji emocjonalnej u seniorów.

Urszula Frączek, Instytut Psychologii, Wydział Nauk Historycznych i Pedagogicznych Uniwersytet Wrocławski ul. J. Wł. Dawida 1, 50-529 Wrocław

Studentka psychologii na Uniwersytecie Wrocławskim. Najbardziej interesują ją tematy badawcze związane z psychologią biznesu i organizacji.

References

Corichi, M. (2021). Eight-in-ten Indians limit meat in their diets, and four-in-ten consider themselves vegetarian. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/07/08/eight-in-ten-indians-limit-meat-in-their-diets-and-four-in-ten-consider-themselves-vegetarian/

Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). W G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Red.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, Vol. 2. Personality measurement and testing (ss. 179–198). Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200479.n9

Cramer, H., Kessler, C. S., Sundberg, T., Leach, M. J., Schumann, D., Adams, J., & Lauche, R. (2017). Characteristics of Americans Choosing Vegetarian and Vegan Diets for Health Reasons. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 49(7), 561-567.

Dinu, M., Abbate, R., Gensini, G. F., Casini, A., & Sofi, F. (2016). Vegetarian, Vegan Diets and Multiple Health outcomes: a Systematic Review with meta-analysis of Observational Studies. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 57(17), 3640–3649.

Fershtman, C., Gneezy, U., & Hoffman, M. (2011). Taboos and Identity: Considering the Unthinkable. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3(2), 139–164.

Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. W R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Red.), Handbook of affective sciences (ss. 852–870). Oxford University Press.

Harris, M. (1974). Cows, pigs, wars, and witches. Vintage.

Hornberger, A. (2020). Plant-Based Diets: Be Healthier while Reducing Your Water Footprint. Clean Water Action. https://www.cleanwateraction.org/2020/11/19/plant-based-diets--be-healthier-while-reducing-your-water-footprint

Janssen, M., Busch, C., Rödiger, M., & Hamm, U. (2016). Motives of Consumers following a Vegan Diet and Their Attitudes Towards Animal Agriculture. Appetite, 105, 643–651.

Jones, C. M. (2019). Cars, Cows, Coal or Consumption: Which Contributes Most to Climate Change?. Cool Climate Network. https://coolclimate.org/blog-cars-coal-cows-consumption

Kirkwood, B. (2020). New Study Reveals 9.6 Million Americans Are Vegan Now, A 300% Increase!. Vegan News. https://vegannews.press/2020/03/06/vegan-america-study/

Leahy, E., Tol, R., & Lyons, S. (2010). ESRI Working Paper No. 340. An Estimate of the Number of Vegetarians in the World. The Economic and Social Research Institute. https://www.esri.ie/publications/an-estimate-of-the-number-of-vegetarians-in-the-world

Liberman, A. (2015). Reactions to Edmund Leach's “Anthropological Aspects of Language” and John Halverson's “Animal Categories and Terms of Abuse”. Anthrozoös, 3(4), 214-226.

Navarrete, C. D., & Fessler, D. (2003). Meat Is Good to Taboo: Dietary Proscriptions as a Product of the Interaction of Psychological Mechanisms and Social Processes. Journal Of Cognition And Culture, 3(1), 1–40.

Radnitz, C., Beezhold, B., & DiMatteo, J. (2015). Investigation of lifestyle choices of individuals following a vegan diet for health and ethical reasons. Appetite, 90, 31–36.

Sentenac, H. (2015). 400 Million Fewer Animals Were Killed for Food Last Year vs. 2007 Because People Are Eating Less Meat. Harm.less, https://www.bharmless.com/400-million-fewer-animals-were-killed-for-food-last-year-because-people-are-eating-less-meat/

Sorokowska, A., Słowińska, A., Zbieg, A., & Sorokowski, P. (2014). Polska adaptacja testu Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) – TIPI-PL – wersja standardowa i internetowa. WrocLab.

Published

2024-08-09

How to Cite

[1]
Kusztal, A., Imbierowicz, E., Kiebus, K. and Frączek, U. 2024. Food taboos outside the religious context:: vegetarians and vegans developed a taboo against meat eating. Gardens of Science and Arts. 14, 14 (Aug. 2024), 35–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.15503/onis2024.35.51.