Dictionaries and ideologies: some remarks of the EFL lexicography

Authors

  • Anna Włodarczyk-Stachurska Faculty of Philology and Pedagogy, Kazimierz Pulaski University of Technology and Humanities in Radom, Malczewskiego 29, 26-600 Radom, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20151.26.39

Keywords:

word, ideology, correctness, standardization, EFL lexicography, dictionary

Abstract

The term ideology itself has recently gained a lot of attention in anthropology, sociolinguistics and cultural studies. As a starting point it seems crucial to form an area of inquiry, that is the sense of language ideology. Here Alan Rumsay’s (1990, p. 346) definition is a useful starting point: „[…] linguistic ideologies are shared bodies of commonsense notions about the nature of language in the world”. The article aims to look at the way EFL dictionaries cope with the task to present the standardization of certain words and usages. In other words, we will attempt to find out if/how lexicographers cope with the job of being legislators, if their products advise about the proper usage as well as meanings of the words available in the standard forms of English. In order to achieve this goal, the number of issues of paramount importance will be investigated:

  • The term of linguistic ideology,
  • The concept of standardization
  • The dictionaries and ideology of standard – the state of the art

 

Our method is making comparisons between different lexicographic sources (dictionaries) in relation to selected entries, and generalising from the way the latter are presented (in the sense of formal and semantic values).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adrian-Vallence, E. (Ed). (2005). Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English London:

Pearson Education Limited.

Baker, C., & Prys Jones, S. (2011) Encyclopedia of Bilingualism and Bilingual Education. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

Goetz, P.W. (Ed.). (2008). The New Encyclopaedia Britannica. Chicago: The University of

Chicago Press.

Hands, P. (Ed.). Collins Cobuild Advanced Dictionary. 6th edition (2009). New York: Harper

Collins.

Hartmann, R.R.K., & James, G. (1998). Dictionary of Lexicography. London: Routledge.

Hornby A. (Ed.). (2005). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary Oxford: Oxford University

Press.

Richards, J. C., & Smith, R. (2002). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and

Applied Linguistics. London/New York: Pearson Education.

Simpson, J.A., & Weiner, E.C.S. (1989). Oxford English Dictionary Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

Baugh A.C., & Cable T. (1993). A History of the English Language. London: Routledge.

Bluestein, G. (1998). Anglish/Yinglish: Yiddish in American Life and Literature. Lincoln:

University of Nebraska Press.

Crystal, D. (2006). How Language Works. London: Penguin Books.

Freeborn, D. (1986). Varieties of English: An Introduction to the Study of Language.

Basingstoke: Palgrave.

Friedrich, P. (1989). Language, ideology and political economy. Am. Anthropol. 91(2).

-312.

Hughes, A., Trudgill, P., & Watt, D. (2005) English Accents and Dialects: An Introduction to

Social and Regional Varieties of English in the British Isles. London: Hodder Arnold.

Kachru, B.B. (1993). American English and other Englishes. Landmarks of American

Language and Linguistics, 2, 127-146.

Kleparski, G. A., Martynuska, M., & Dziama, A. (2010). The Highlights of

Anglo-Saxon Culture and Language. A College and University Guide. Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego.

Kortmann, B. (2005). English Linguistic: Essentials – Anglistitik – Amerikanistik. Berlin:

Cornelsen Verlag.

McArthur, T. (1992). The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

Milroy, J., & L. Milroy (1992). Authority in Language: Investigating Language Prescribtion

and Standardisation. London: Routledge.

Pêcheux, M. (1982). Language, Semantics and Ideology. London: Macmillan.

Rumsay, A. (1990). Wording, meaning and linguistic ideology. American

anthropologist, 92,346-361.

Schieffelin, B. B. (Ed.) (1998). Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. Oxford: Oxford

University Press.

Silverstain, M. (1987). Monoglot ‘standard’ in America: Standarization and metaphors

of linguistic hegemony. [In:] D. Brennies, & R. K.S. Macaulay (Eds.), The

Matrix of Language: Contemporary Linguistic Anthropology (pp.284-306). Boulder, Colorado: Westwiev Press.

Silverstain, M. (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. In: R. Clyne, W. Hanks,

& C. Hofbauer. The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels (pp.

-274). Chicago: Chicago Linguist Soc.

Smolinski F., (1993). Landmarks of American Language and Linguistics, vol.1, Materials

Development and Review Branch English Language Programs Division United States

Information Agency: Washington, D.C.

Štekauer, P. (1993). Essentials of English Linguistics. Presov: Slovacontact.

Thompson, J.B. (1984). Studies in the Theory of Ideology. Cambridge: Polity.

Walter, E. (Ed.). (2008). Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. 3rd edition Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Włodarczyk-Stachurska, A. (2010) On sociolinguistic variation: the case of English women

terms. Radom: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Radomskiej.

Włodarczyk-Stachurska, A. (2012). Sociolinguistic stratification in EFL lexicography.

[In:] P. Łozowski, & A. Włodarczyk-Stachurska, A. (Eds.), Words in

Contexts: From Linguistic Forms to Literary Functions. (pp.161-176.) Radom: Wydawnictwo Politechniki Radomskiej.

Woolard, K., A., & Schieffelin, B., B. (1994). Language Ideology. Annual Reviews. 24, 55-

Downloads

Published

2020-01-03

How to Cite

Włodarczyk-Stachurska, A. . (2020). Dictionaries and ideologies: some remarks of the EFL lexicography. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 6(1), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20151.26.39