QUALITY OF ARCHITECUTRE AND PUBLIC SPACES AS A RESULT OF COUNTRY’S PUBLIC PROCUREMENT CULTURE

Authors

  • Maciej Wojciech Kowalczyk Faculty of Architecture, Warsaw Univeristy of Technology, Koszykowa 55, 00-659 Warszawa, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8396-9655

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20192.103.108

Keywords:

architecture, building culture, baukultur, architectural design contest, architectural competition, competition practices, public porcurement, procurement of design services

Abstract

Thesis. The quality of emerging public spaces and buildings is related to the public procurement culture of a given country. One can not count on achieving high quality public space, architecture without a democratic debate on the subject. The space, which is decided only by a small group of technocrats, the project, which is subject to only the price criterion, results in accidental solutions.

Methods. The article shows the basic methods provided for by law to select public projects. Indicates the advantages and disadvantages of individual processes. It analyzes examples of appreciated realizations that arose as a result of architectural competitions.

Results. Tools provided in the public procurement law, such as social debate in the form of architectural competitions build a better quality of the created space. The existence of such a link is proven by the awards granted to spaces completed under such processes.

Conclusions. Projects created using these tools account for less than 1% of all public procurement in Poland. One should strive for a change that would promote these processes, especially outside large cities, thus increasing the quality of spaces created from public money.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Maciej Wojciech Kowalczyk, Faculty of Architecture, Warsaw Univeristy of Technology, Koszykowa 55, 00-659 Warszawa, Poland

Graduated from the Faculty of Architecture at Warsaw University of Technology (WAPW) and ETH Zurich (MAS ETH Housing). Since 2017 PhD candidate and lecturer at WAPW. Interested in the practical side of the profession, particularly in architectural competitions. Besides scientific work, runs architecture office 22ARCHITEKCI as well as works pro publico bono at the Association of Polish Architects (SARP).

References

Architects’ Council of Europe (2018). Architectural Design Contest. Retrieved from: https://www.ace-cae.eu/policies/

Miasto Stołeczne Warszawa (2017). Policy no 1758/2017 of the Mayor of Warsaw. Retrieved from: http://um.warszawa.pl/.

Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (2017). Ustawa Prawo Zamówień Publicznych [Polish Public Procurement Act]. Retrieved from: http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20170001579.

Sejm Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej (1963). Kodeks Cywilny [Civil Law]. Retrieved from: http://prawo.sejm.gov.pl.

Urząd Zamówień Publicznych (2018). Informacja o Polskim rynku zamówień publicznych na podstawie ogłoszeń opublikowanych w Biuletynie Zamówień Publicznych (stan na dzień 31 grudnia 2018 r.) [Information on the Polish public procurement market based on notices published in the Public Procurement Bulletin (as at 31 December 2018)]. Retrieved from: http://uzp.gov.pl.

Urząd Zamówień Publicznych (2018). Sprawozdanie Prezesa Urzędu Zamówień Publicznych o funkcjonowaniu systemu zamówień publicznych w 2017 r. [Report of the President of the Public Procurement Office on the functioning of the public procurement system in 2017]. Retrieved from: http://uzp.gov.pl.

Bonnkirch D. (2017). Competitionline Ausschreibungsmonitor 2017 [Competitionline tender monitor 2017]. Paper presented at 8. Warszawskie Rozmowy Architektoniczne 2017, Warsaw.

Achatzi H. (2017). Konkurs architektoniczny w Niemczech - formy, koszty, wyniki [Architectural competition in Germany – forms, costs, results]. Paper presented at 8. Warszawskie Rozmowy Architektoniczne 2017, Warsaw.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-02

How to Cite

Kowalczyk, M. W. (2019). QUALITY OF ARCHITECUTRE AND PUBLIC SPACES AS A RESULT OF COUNTRY’S PUBLIC PROCUREMENT CULTURE. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 10(2), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs20192.103.108